![]() ![]() Since amazon was only looking to get its investment back, but not a profit, then clearly the intent of both parties was to eventually have it release to the public. But the contract, and its limitations, go on. Plans change, people leave, things are forgotten. I think that would be a net loss for everyone.Ī reasoning that doesnt require (too much) arrogance: contracts and business rules hold despite changes in context. I'm worried that the next time NARA is in talks with someone about a digitization agreement (for example, if there's a large number of early jazz audio recordings on 1/4" reels and Spotify is interesting in paying the cost of digitization in exchange for 2-3 years of exclusivity) that the company will point to this example and say "didn't you just let a researcher publish the entire collection Amazon digitized? How can you assure us the same thing won't happen with these recordings?" The result will be the National Archives clamping down on researcher access. The tradeoff is between the immediacy of access vs the number of assets digitized and the team at NARA made the decision that it was better for the American people to have more assets digitized. If it weren't for agreements like this, Amazon would only want to digitize the films for which they knew they could turn a profit and the vast majority of the collection would sit un-digitized and be at risk of loss. To me, it sounds more than a little arrogant.Ī big reason the National Archives enters into agreements like this with companies is that digitization, especially on their scale, is expensive. #MAKEMKV KEY 2018 HOW TO#That said, planning to use a researcher's pass to "set these treasures free" and blaming Amazon for not having generated more revenue from these films makes it sound like the OP thinks he knows better than the staff of the National Archives how to best care for these assets and that he knows better than the folks at Amazon how to turn a profit. I completely understand the frustration if this is indeed the above set of films and it's been over eleven years since the digitization agreement and files have not yet been made freely available to the public. My guess is they're the films described in the CustomFlix partnership announced here:įor all the helpful advice offered both here and on Reddit about how to do this, I wish there had been more time asking if this was something the OP should be doing in the first place. It’s time to set these national treasures free. ![]() I was looking at many of these titles yesterday. I am doing research there and I have have a research pass. The flipside of the catch is that the DVDs can be viewed and even copied for $0 on site by researchers. (In part because amazon hasn’t even had them all available to sell. It’s been years now and for a variety of reasons - many of which are Amazon’s fault - there still exist a solid number of discs that Amazon hasn’t sold even one of. Years ago in partnership with the National Archives digitized a tremendous amount of film for the National Archives, with the catch that the material cannot be freely disseminated online by the National Archives until Amazon breaks even on their digitization investment. Washington DC, specifically College Park, even more specifically The National Archives at College Park. Maybe you should disclose your city or at least state/general location ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |